“There are roughly 480,000 reverse mortgages currently outstanding in the United States.”, writes Mancini who notes this number will likely grow as baby boomers age. More importantly, she notes HECM borrowers who are delinquent on their property charge payments face hurdles in accessing the resources needed to satisfy the overdue charges to avoid a technical default and foreclosure. Mancini notes, “The crisis of preventable reverse mortgage foreclosures does not impact all communities equally. Historically, people of color have been more likely to take out reverse mortgages, due to the legacy of discrimination and policies that limited their wealth-building opportunities, and they are also more likely to end up in reverse mortgage foreclosure.”. 

The NCLS’s full report (which we’ve included a link to in today’s show notes) provided several examples of where servicing failed HECM borrowers. Here’s one. Jean Reese, a 76-year-old African-American woman living in Philadelphia, fell behind on her property taxes during the Covid-19 pandemic. She made a payment arrangement with the city and also kept in regular contact with her HECM loan servicer. Despite these efforts in December 2019, the servicer paid the remaining property taxes she had arranged to pay with the city and also paid her future 2020 taxes. It’s a lengthy and complex story but in the end, Reese had to obtain legal assistance to conclude the matter and avoid foreclosure. 

Drawing on their findings in the report, Mancini and the NCLC made four recommendations for FHA and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to help prevent avoidable foreclosures. The recommendations for the FHA include (1) Allowing flexibility with property charge loss mitigation policies, (2) Rescinding the due and payable status when loss mitigation is approved, (3) Allowing loans to be assigned to FHA while in an active loss mitigation plan, and (4) require a loss mitigation review.  The recommendations to the CFPB include (1) the inclusion of reverse mortgages in the RESPA mortgage servicing rules, (2) working with FHA on effective reverse mortgage communications, (3) prioritizing reverse mortgage servicer supervision and enforcement, and (4) requiring prompt payoff statements.

The NCLC conducted a nationwide survey of senior advocates who handle reverse mortgage cases. Some of the more notable responses said that some servicers declared a homeowner was still in default despite them being already enrolled in a state or local tax deferral or repayment program.

Addressing the servicing issues outlined in the report only stands to strengthen the reputation of the reverse mortgage among older homeowners, senior advocates, and professionals. Or has Mancini put it to ‘fulfill the promise’ of the loan to help older homeowners age in place. What are your thoughts on the NCLC’s recommendations? Do you think these servicing reforms need to