Are More HECM Reforms Needed?

ePath reverse mortgage leads


Are More Rule Changes Needed or Does Data Need to Be Reexamined?

The new year is upon us and we can leave 2016 in the rear view mirror, with the exception of HUD’s pending reverse mortgage rules. Are additional HECM reforms truly needed to strengthen the HECM program?

loading-iconIn the wake of the election and the new year, lingering HECM program changes can be easily forgotten. Last May FHA introduced a series of new rules to strengthen the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage program. The changes included required HECM counseling prior to signing s mortgage contract, disclosure of all HECM features and options, and most problematically, a 5% lifetime cap on the adjustable rate HECM with a 1% annual interest rate cap. Numerous industry participants and the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association submitted inputs to the agency in the Federal Register. Several months have passed and yet there is no word if these substantial product changes will be enacted. Presently the proposed rule changes are in the final rule stage prior to regulatory review.

Many industry participants have voiced their concern that these changes will negatively impact the HECM program. Perhaps a more relevant point is the question if such changes are even necessary. Is the HECM program’s economic outlook as bleak as HUD’s recent report to Congress suggests?

HUD’s most recent report to Congress shows the HECM portion of FHA’s portfolio is valued at a negative $7.7 billion dollars. That represents a $13 billion dollar swing to the negative dropping from the previous year’s valuation of a positive $6.8 billion. Much of the impact can be attributed to slowing home appreciation upon which much of the economic modeling depends upon.

However, what is somewhat problematic are reports that HUD’s internal assumption are based on 100% of the available principal limit is used at the beginning of the loan. This assumed front-loaded loan balance is then factored based on future interest rates and the borrower’s age. This mathematical approach drastically increase the negative amortization of the HECM loan and the assumed ending loan balance…

Download the video transcript here.

Scalpel or an Axe? HECM Reforms.

[ad#Network Funding]

Without Congressional Authority FHA is Faced with Hard Choices

[vimeo id=”71124155″ width=”625″ height=”352″]

Reverse Mortgage News

HUD would prefer to take the surgeon’s approach making fine tuned adjustments to the federally-insured reverse mortgage or HECM program. Presently it is left with the axe of harsh change unless Congress acts to give them the authority needed before the beginning of next fiscal year October 1st. The blunt approach was mentioned in a recent Senate Banking Committee hearing last week when Assistant Secretary of HUD Carol Galante reassured senators that they have no plans to bring back the standard fixed rate product.

Assistant Secretary Galante mentioned another option…more principal limit reductions across the board. “If we can’t make those nuanced changes, we are going to have to say the entire amount [that can be borrowed] is going to be just lowered for everybody across the board.”