HECM Regional Limits? A look at HUD's Legislative Requests - HECMWorld.com Skip to content
Advertisement

HECM Regional Limits? A look at HUD’s Legislative Requests

Advertisement
Advertisement

HUD’s 2025 Congressional Budget Justifications reveals proposed HECM changes

Will HECMs return to regional loan limits? This question arises from the Biden Administration’s 2025 Federal Budget and HUD’s 2025 Congressional justifications for their budget request. Today I’m going to walk you through the relevant changes including several notable proposed legislative changes to the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage program.


First, the proposal to allow HUD to establish regional loan limits. The Congressional justification states, “Currently, Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECMs) are subject to a single national HECM limit of $1,149,825 regardless of property location”. If approved this proposal would allow, but not require, HUD to establish regional loan limits aligned to the limits currently in place for the single-family Forward program. 


The operative words are allow versus require which means the agency could potentially use their discretion to determine which areas would fall under a lower HECM limit. If Congress were to approve such legislative changes borrowers with higher-valued homes in Low Cost Areas would be most impacted. While HUD’s motives are unclear such limits if enacted would substantially reduce available HECM loan proceeds leaving a much larger equity cushion for homes that far exceed county limits.  


For example, the single-family single-unit loan limit for traditional or forward FHA loans in a low-cost area is $498,257. That’s over $650,000 less than the current national HECM limit.  Those originating in counties with lower average incomes and values would be most impacted. 


But let’s look closer at some real-life examples. Using HUD’s FHA mortgage limit lookup tool we’ll look up the list of FHA limits in Kansas City, Missouri. As we can see every county in the state falls under the low-cost area limit of $498,257 for single units. If a regional limit were enacted, a 72-year-old reverse mortgage applicant in Kansas City Missouri with a home appraised at $750,000 at an expected rate of 7.25% would see their gross principal limit reduced from approximately $271,000 under today’s HECM limit regime down to $180,000- a $91,000 reduction in proceeds with only $498,257 of the home’s appraised  $750,000 value considered. 


Let’s try a state with a concentration of higher-valued homes, California. Here you’ll see both Low Cost Area and High Cost Area limits for single-unit properties by county or Metropolitan Statistical Area. Remember, these are not conforming limits but FHA limits. Some counties such as Los Angeles currently have a $1,149,825 maximum which is the same as our current national HECM limit. Keep in mind, that these loan limits are presently for FHA-insured forward mortgages. 


Other regions such as Kern County and Bakersfield have homes that are typically worth far less than homes in larger metropolitan areas. Kern County’s 2024 FHA limit is $498,257 while areas such as San Jose, San Francisco, and Los Angeles all fall under the high-cost limit. 


When considering these proposed legislative changes remember that similar requests to return to regional HECM limits, prohibiting HECM refinances, among others have been put forth but never passed by Congress.


Other notable proposed legislative changes to the HECM if approved by Congress include requiring HECM counseling for all refinance HECM transactions regardless if they received counseling within the last five years which is the current standard. Another proposal is to clarify the definition of a non-borrowing spouse as the NBS identified at the time of origination, but not to subsequent spouses. A removal of the cap on the number of HECMs that can be insured by FHA is also proposed. Lastly, since HUD has complied with the requirement that the HECM Actuarial Analysis examines the impact of HECM premiums, lower upfront premiums for refinances, and the existing national loan or HECM limit, the agency is asking for a conforming change to collect lower insurance premiums for HECM-to-HECM refinances. It’s unclear if that means the agency could eliminate or reduce the current upfront mortgage insurance premium credit allowed for refinances.


Of course, we will keep you updated should we see any developments regarding these proposed HECM legislative changes.

 

.

 
Advertisement

Share:

Editor in Chief: HECMWorld.com
 
As a prominent commentator and Editor in Chief at HECMWorld.com, Shannon Hicks has played a pivotal role in reshaping the conversation around reverse mortgages. His unique perspectives and deep understanding of the industry have not only educated countless readers but has also contributed to introducing practical strategies utilizing housing wealth with a reverse mortgage.
 
Shannon’s journey into the world of reverse mortgages began in 2002 as an originator and his prior work in the financial services industry. Shannon has been covering reverse mortgage news stories since 2008 when he launched the podcast HECMWorld Weekly. Later, in 2010 he began producing the weekly video series The Industry Leader Update and Friday’s Food for Thought.
 
Readers wishing to submit stories or interview requests can reach our team at: info@hecmworld.com.

Leave a Comment

2 Comments

  1. If the cap on the number of HECMs that can be endorsed in total were eliminated, NRMLA could not keep telling us each year how getting that cap suspended that year was such a critical function that NRMLA performs on behalf of its members. Removing the cap altogether would mean one less thing NRMLA could tell us annually just how indispensable it is to the industry

  2. Would returning to a county by county approach be so bad on the volume HECM endorsements based on historical data and how Shannon described it? In all likelihood the historical data would have to be provided by HUD categorized by state and fiscal year of endorsement. HUD would have to provide since only HUD can authoritatively say how this provision would have been applied retroactively due to subjective application of its provision s.


Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement

Recent Stories

Topics

Subscribe to join our World

Get the latest reverse mortgage news delivered straight to your inbox.